The vocabulary of globalist propaganda
The propagandists of the New World Order have been working at it for decades, so you would think that by now everyone has been indoctrinated with globalist propaganda. They control the education system, the government, the large corporations, the international organizations, the media, the Democrats and the Republicans, the think tanks, the newspapers, the free trade associations, the Communists and the capitalists. So how can anyone escape from their verbal sludge?
Well, you have to be a little bit intelligent, and it helps to attend a university devoted to exposing globalist lies.
To begin today’s lesson, read John Bolton’s piece at Commentary. Bolton was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations under the Bush administration, but Bolton recently denounced Bush administration globalist initiatives in an interview with Sean Hannity. For the moment, until proven otherwise, we believe Bolton is one of the good guys. Bolton warns us about global norming. What is global norming? It is the attempt to put U.S. policies into a globalist straitjacket based on what other countries are doing. In other words, if other countries fall under globalist propaganda, the United States should also, so that it can join the “global community” as a conformist to the globalist party line. Bolton also notes that the globalists are redefining sovereignty as “responsible sovereignty.” Responsible sovereignty is different from the old national definition of sovereignty. It means cooperating with the international machinery rather than looking out for the interest of national citizens.
“Give us the child for eight years and it will be a Bolshevik forever.” Vladimir Lenin
Next let’s move over to the Carnegie Council, one of the oldest global takeover think tanks. Carnegie’s interview with Ann Florini yields a few more globalist propaganda gems. To get nations to surrender their power to the New World Order tyranny, the globalists must invent problems that are global rather than national. Today these problems are defined as global security, global trade, global human rights, and global climate change. Florini explains that a “civil society” must be created that demands these global solutions to the phony global problems. Creation of a pseudosociety that the globalists can control has been a long-term project of global Marxism. First, genuine societies must be destroyed through economic subversion, mass education, appeals to individualism, elimination of the family and religion, and demoralization (drugs, pop culture role models, culture war) to get people to embrace “collectivization” under Marxism. Then they turn their power over to their government. Then their government turns its power over to the global controllers. “Global governance” then replaces government. The main feature of global governance is that it comes from the top and is imposed on the “civil society.” For their own good, of course.
Global governance is a stealth program of takeover sponsored by UN intergovernmental organizations. Florini wants you to believe that these UN organizations are like coral reefs. The rhetoric of the various Communist front groups is pretty much interchangeable, by analogy. This is what passes for thinking on the Left.
Florini characterizes anybody who opposes this takeover as “reactionary.” OK, we’ll wear that label with pride. She also articulates the central role of “climate change” as an excuse to completely reorganize the world’s economy. The excuse for doing this is that national and local institutions and policies are not “sustainable.” Florini also makes clear that the Communists must be included in the global takeover. This is called the “broader relationship.”
“The goal of socialism is Communism.” Vladimir Lenin
At the bottom of the global pyramid are the “social entrepreneurs.” These are the low-level cadres who move in to reorganize a local area when the authority structures and the economy have been destroyed. It’s another term for “community organizer.” It’s a way to structure localities so that no one can escape from Communist takeover and obedience to New World Order governance directives. These poor saps are “volunteers” and “change-agents.” They do the dirty work of globalist takeover out of “passion” and “commitment” rather than getting a piece of the action. Ashoka is only one of their many front organizations. “Multiculturalism” will operate on this local level to displace real societies with Communist pseudosocieties. It is preferable that change-agents be young single-issue idealists with no concept of the global takeover.
Back to The Carnegie Council. Jeffrey Sachs is a leading New World Order “economist” whose Millenium Task Force is devoted to funding globalism with national taxpayer funds. Sach’s propaganda line is that “humanity shares a common fate.” Well, it will share a common fate if the globalists take over, global slavery. Besides the global environment, Sachs uses global poverty, global security, and overpopulation as rationales for global takeover. Sachs blames the Federal Reserve for the global economic crisis. Sach’s economic analysis is party-line liberal and is not worth reading. The main point is, he wants higher taxes and he wants money allocated to globalist institutions. His recipe for global economic recovery is U.S. cooperation with Communist China. Sachs’ analysis may not be worth much, but at least he’s got us thinking globally. Sachs is always on the lookout for sources of funds to finance local Soviets under UN control.
The globalists need to make up some phony global problem in order to enlist you into supporting them. Or, they need to get you believe that humanity is one, united, in need of uniting, in the process of uniting, only able to manifest its potential when united, yearns to be united, etc. Then they can get you to waste your life butting into other people’s business armed with their slogans, phony problems, and false ideals. Heck, you can even make a career out of attending conferences, sharing strategies, and coining new propaganda terms.
About The Author
We’ve never subscribed to the idea that one group is “controlling both sides” or “managing conflict”, but if you would like to start your own blog and offer your ideas, send us a link and we’ll take a look at your documentation. Also Tony, we don’t publish comments that advocate violence. We believe you would be happier at some other site that matches your sophistication.