Progress means total takeover
Let’s start with Hal Colbatch’s article in The Australian, which characterizes British efforts to criminalize free speech dissenting from Communist political correctness as thought crimes and hate crimes. Legislation that restricts free speech is linked to the slogan, “promoting diversity.” The New World Order controllers do not want free speech, dissent, or a free internet. They do not want reporting on their activities.
“It would be hard to think of a person less well suited for the position. She makes Dr. Strangelove look sane.”
Wired magazine is a valuable resource of reporting on technological advances in data gathering and civilian spy techniques. Noah Schachtman’s article on the appointment of Tara O’Toole to the Department of Homeland Security in Wired caught our attention. O’Toole is one of the leading authorities on bioterrorism. O’Toole is both a designer of counterterrorism exercises and a lobbyist for more dollars devoted to bioterrist counterinsurgency. If you believe the Department of Homeland Security is about defending America from terrorists, take a look at O’Toole’s track record in aiding the biodefense industry. Building up “homeland security” is a very profitable business.
Why would Obama appoint the least qualified women, O’Toole and Napolitano, to Homeland Security?
Governments are building the New World Order control system using your tax dollars to make selected investors in data gathering, computer databases, and monitoring technology wealthy. Essentially, we are paying them to develop more efficient ways to control us. If you imagine that hacks, losses, and thefts of databases are unfortunate accidents, think again. If you imagine that national security threats are overinflated to promote more government spending without accountability, you are on the right track.
Wired’s Darpawatch category is your source for keeping up with DARPA’s military technology innovations. Dark Government also reports on DARPA’s progress in robotics.
Dark Government has an extensive report on the FBI’s Investigative Data Warehouse, how the FBI gathers, stores, and uses information. Data mining systems and budget requests seem to be “off the radar” of public reporting. Does anybody in Congress actually monitor these special programs? Where does all the money go? The less reporting, the more able they are to loot the Treasury.
At Aviation Week, Ares reports on the Pentagon’s black budget spending.
Even as the government amasses huge databases on its citizens, its own databases are open to hackers. One example: theft of the design of the Joint Fighter Strike program, probably by China. Another example: zombie networks devoted to stealing your financial information.
Britain appears to be leading the world in controlling its citizens. The BBC reports on tagging and tracking visitors to theme parks. The Mail reports on the use of face-scanning technology in schools to track tardy students. check on school lunch lines, etc. The technology does not appear to speed up queues as promised. Britain’s e-borders program compiles a database on each traveler to and from Britain. Information gathered by travel agents is compiled, then shared with numerous government departments. Phone records are already available to just about every level of government as well as private businesses. Police cars in Britain now carry tracking devices that allow central monitoring of police units.
Microsoft has developed a camera called a sense-cam that allows people to photograph you without carrying around a camera or a camera phone. Britain has developed a traffic-monitoring station equipped with a variety of sensors that blends into surroundings so you don’t know you’ve been photographed until the notice arrives in the mail that you’ve been caught speeding.
If you imagine that all this technology and all these databases are going to be used to save us from terror attacks, think again. Each of these systems is vulnerable to abuse. The abuse opportunity is built-in to give the New World Order criminals the opportunity to profit twice, once when they build the system and again when they hack it or sell it.
There is no indication that governments are responsive to citizens groups protesting the buildup of the spy system. They are going to put in the Big Brother system, whether you oppose them or not. How they use it may never be known to the public, especially if they are able to control dissent through speech codes and internet controls.
Once the control systems are in place, things can change quickly.
This is exactly what i was looking for. thank you for the informative post and keep up the good work!