Update on the North American Union

Posted By on July 28, 2008

Due to a lack of public enthusiasm about the North American Union, the Security and Prosperity Partnership is changing its name to NASRA. See the report at the American Policy Center website: http://www.americanpolicy.org/sledgehammer/busted.htm

Also see their report, North American Union Factsheet at http://www.americanpolicy.org/pdf/NAUFS-new.pdf

The Conservative Caucus has established a North American Union “war room” at http://www.nauwarroom.org/

See their site for articles on Chinese sweatshops, poisoned goods entering America, boycotting the Olympics, etc. at http://www.conservativeusa.org/

Mexican drug gangs taking over U.S.

Posted By on May 19, 2008

Mexican drug cartels are taking over U.S. cities. Representative Tom Tancredo provides evidence of Mexican drug gangs buying local U.S. businesses and influencing local elections in an attempt to shut down local police operations.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50518

Frontline on PBS offers a map of drug cartel influence:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/mexico/etc/maps.html

Reporting from Mexico on the cartels’ infiltration of the Mexican government:

http://www.coxwashington.com/hp/content/reporters/stories/2007/06/03/BC_

MEXICO_DRUGS_QA03_COX.html

Who sold 50 planes to the Mexican drug cartels?

http://www.madcowprod.com/01162008.html

The Washington Post reports on Mexican drug cartels operating inside the U.S.:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/19/AR

2007091902442.html

Are governments going broke?

Posted By on April 5, 2008

The conventional wisdom is that governments at every level are teetering on the edge of bankruptcy with mountains of risky debt. This perception is used to justify higher tax rates. Actually, governments in the U.S. own over $60 trillion in assets–stocks, bonds, real estate, business ventures–which are off balance sheet. See the following website for a rarely discussed accounting of government assets and how the controllers place these money pools and assets off balance sheet to fool the public into supporting higher taxes. Governments own vast tracts of land and control over 48 percent of the so-called capitalist economy. These assets could be used to reduce taxes, fund public programs such as education, and insure the life of entitlement programs. Instead these assets are hidden and controlled by a few elite politicians for the profit of their friends. The only way to get an honest accounting of these assets is to demand that governments at all levels adopt honest accounting practices.

http://www.nonwo.com/biggestgame/

World Bank profiting from global warming hoax

Posted By on April 5, 2008

NWOU is not surprised that the global controllers are using global warming as a means of extorting money from nations to line their own pockets. NWOU is only surprised that Reuters would report the story:
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSBKK28941120080404?

A good reason to boycott Absolut vodka

Posted By on April 5, 2008

It’s not just the Marxists who want a New World Order. The global capitalists are in on the game and in most cases are taking the lead through the formation of “free” trade associations. Here is an ad for Absolut vodka showing the capitalist support for Communist aspirations–the reconquest of southwestern states and their reintegration into Mexico.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laplaza/2008/04/mexico-reconque.html

Solar cooling

Posted By on February 8, 2008

NWOU is not much interested in the global warming debate as we have identified the global warming propagandists as Marxists in The Hidden Masters Who Rule the World. The global warming hoax was planned by the Club of Rome. Those who fell for this Marxist propaganda may begin to correct themselves by consulting www.junkscience.com. Environmental activists are Communist agents and dupes. The Green Party in Germany was founded by a Communist, Herbert Marcuse. Has anybody noticed that this winter was particularly severe in China, Russia, Argentina, and our Midwest? Many areas of the globe are experiencing severe cooling. The environmentalists’ belief that the world is a single environment is laughable. To orient yourself to the coming global cooling cycle, see the article at http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175

For more articles on the global warming hoax, see http://www.changingworldviews.com/IssuesLibrary/environment.htm#080227

The article at The National Post by Lorne Gunter cites NASA satellite data indicating there has been no rise in average global temperatures since 1979.

The myth of free trade

Posted By on February 6, 2008

NWOU recently came across a nice article by Chalmers Johnson reviewing the work of Ha-Joon Chang, an economist at Cambridge University who specializes in Third World studies. Ha-Joon Chang is a Korean economist and author of Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (2002).

Chang drew his theoretical orientation from German economist Friedrich List, who criticized Britain in 1841 for preaching free trade while maintaining high tariffs and subsidies for its industries. List criticized Britain for “kicking away the ladder” by advocating free trade policies so that other nations could not reach its level of economic development. Chang has extended this analysis to the history of economic development and shows that all the successful economies got successful through high tariffs and protectionist policies. During the nineteenth century, U.S. tariff rates were around 50 percent, the highest of any country in the world at the time that the U.S. was the fastest-growing economy in the world.

Chang provides a necessary rebuttal to free-traders such as Thomas Friedman (The Lexus and the Olive Branch). He calls them Bad Samaritans for taking advantage of developing economies by promoting free trade that mainly benefits the wealthy internationalists.
Chang points out that granting a central bank the exclusive monopoly over issuing bank notes and the idea that democracy fosters economic growth were never part of classical liberal economic theory. These ideas were inserted into classical liberalism by international monopolists. Government subsidies for growing industries have always been part of a successful development strategy. The U.S. government continues to subsidized research through defense spending and grants to university professors, science under socialism. The U.S. also heavily subsidizes agriculture, which only benefits large farmers. The subsidized export of corn to Mexico drives small Mexican farmers out of business and encourages illegal immigration while making big farmers rich. The effect is multiplied by government subsides for ethanol.

Chang shows that developing economies’ growth rates began to slow in the 1970s as a result of UN policies of intervention, including birth control, gender equity, and multiculturalism. The Third World economic growth rates fell to 1.7 percent in the 1980s as opposed to 4.5 percent in the 1960s. Since the 1980s, African living standards have fallen as African economies were taken over by World Bank and IMF policies. When the WTO and IMF order trade liberalization, growth rates fall and unemployment increases in the poorer nations unless they manage to maintain subsides to their industries.

Chang takes on the false histories of Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington, which blame culture for economic stagnation. These false histories stem from Max Weber’s observation that a “Protestant ethic” was necessary for economic development. Weber contended that Asia could never develop economically because of its Confucian and Buddhist culture. Chang argues that Weber had it backward: the emergence of the market economy promotes an ethic of economic efficiency regardless of culture.

Chang points out that culture has little to do with economic success. Histories identifying cultural traits as predicting economic success are based on national stereotyping. National stereotyping was a dominant way of thinking adopted by Marx and Engels when they wrote their false histories.

Chang also takes on the myth that consumers and exporters in the U.S. benefit from free trade. See the whole article at http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19174.htm

NWOU recently watched speeches by Maggie Thatcher on CSPAN from the 1980s glorifying free trade as the vehicle for reform of tyrannical governments.

Free trade does not reform governments.

Free trade policies make tyrannical governments richer and drive local businesses out of business. The only people who benefit from free trade policies are large corporations and the politicians they pay to defend their interests.