Takeover or collapse?

Posted By on April 5, 2010

We go to Centurean2 for reporting on the socialist takeover of Britain. Centurean reports local news, and their New World Order history usually checks out with our careful research. But it was a speculative piece that caught our attention this time, the takeover timeline. (more…)

Why sociology is anti-human, Part 2

Posted By on April 1, 2010

We can quickly apply our understanding of Emile Durkheim’s errors to the two main attempts to create the social contract, the French and American revolutions. The social contract is the basis for the Constitution of the United States. The basic idea is that man can form a new civil society through rebellion by agreeing to be governed by the new civil institutions the Constitution creates. We understand the appeal of the American Revolution for ambitious free traders such as Hancock and ambitious landholders such as Washington. We even understand the appeal of freedom from British control by ultra-conservative Virginia slaveholders. But the idea that the secular civil society replaces and destroys the existing genuine societies (based on ethnic groups united by a religion) is not well articulated by any founding father. Just the opposite, the Bill of Rights and the refusal to outlaw slavery appeared to reinforce older social customs, the idea of religious tolerance had widespread appeal, and the appeal to freedom made any thinking about society appear retrograde. No one, at the beginning of the American experiment, recognized that the creation of civil society would allow the Marxists to build upon this new invention to eliminate the family, religion, and culture and force the integration of the existing ethnic groups so that whites would be discriminated against and controlled by black, gay, and feminist bureaucrats. (more…)

Why sociology is anti-human, Part 1

Posted By on March 30, 2010

If you attend college you will be indoctrinated into the social sciences, and even if you don’t attend college you will be bombarded with the propaganda that the social sciences establish some “truths” about society. Today we’ll help you recognize the false intellectual basis for the social sciences as part of our project of Undoing false modern beliefs. We’re going to focus on one social scientist, Emile Durkheim, as our starting point. (more…)

News from the edge

Posted By on March 28, 2010

We have been focusing on longer pieces lately, especially on the feminist takeover of world population control. We hope you are finding your own reliable news sources on the net. We aren’t your news source, but here are a few news stories we found around the cutting edge of the crisis the New World Order causes: (more…)

The window war

Posted By on March 26, 2010

Finally, a little resistance. Ten Democrats get backlash threats. Window-breaking, voicemail insults, a shot fired. News summary from Day One of the Resistance. (more…)

Can Obama keep the corruption going?

Posted By on March 24, 2010

Today’s post is based on anthropological theorizing. Even though we are drawing from anthropology and not the hidden history today, we are not just larking around in a false worldview, today’s post is a serious analysis. In fact, we surprised ourself with the accuracy of our analysis and will be developing some implications of our conclusions in future posts.

If you have studied anthropology, you have probably come across the idea of the “big man” operating in many traditional societies. The “big man” does not arise in every society, but he arises in a large number of societies and serves as a model for anthropological theorizing about development toward the powerful state. The “big man” draws a number of helpers to himself, stimulates extra labor toward economic production, then shares this surplus with his society in a great feast. Most societies with “big men” have severe restrictions on the big man’s consumption of these extra resources. In fact, many big men are incentivized to restrict consumption among their immediate followers so that more surplus production can be distributed widely, thereby inflating his public standing. (more…)

The population genocide, Part 2

Posted By on March 22, 2010

Review of Matthew Connelly, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.

The UNFPA became the central population control agency, but
immediately it was criticized for bypassing national governments and
being unaccountable to UN member states. UNFPA was criticized as a
“U.S. front organization.” UNFPA had no assessment personnel. Awash
with funds from Rockefeller, Sweden, and the U.S., UNFPA decided it
needed to launder its sources of funds by enlisting the World Bank as
stand-in financier. Moreover, many countries were actually
underpopulated and were experiencing declining fertility rates
without population control programs. Some of these countries united
to oppose fertility control in their countries. (more…)