Stale news

Posted By on September 18, 2010

We’ve been preoccupied with explaining how to reclaim your identity and find your warrior by escaping from liberal mind control, but here are a few old stories of interest that we gathered during the past few weeks. These stories are stale by now, but you can use them as a test to make sure you have a grasp of the basic goals of the New World Order controllers and the trendline to total tyranny. (more…)

Why psychology is evil, Part 2

Posted By on September 13, 2010

Review of Rebecca Lemov, World as Laboratory, New York: Hill and Wang, 2005.

Around 1915 the public came to believe in Freud’s concept of the subconscious mind and a need for self-analysis. This false belief led to a search for a control mechanism to mediate the flood of subconscious impulses (unconscious sex and aggression drives) that many believed were constantly motivating human behavior. But the idea of a deeper unconscious self conflicted with the behaviorist idea of the self as nothing more than conditioned stimulus-response habits. This difference in mental models split psychology into two competing camps.

In 1927 Harold Lasswell performed psychoanalysis upon a patient whose physiological responses were monitored by electrodes hooked up to measuring machines. From his experiments developed the polygraph and various scientific torture devices. Lasswell’s research was banned as both the psychotherapists and the behaviorists hated the linking of the two schools of psychology. However, a later group of psychologists that included Neal Miller, Hobart Mowrer, Robert Sears, Lenard Doob, and John Dollard attempted to isolate and control mental function at Yale University. (more…)

Why psychology is evil, Part 1

Posted By on September 9, 2010

Review of Rebecca Lemov, World as Laboratory, New York: Hill and Wang, 2005.

Social engineering was funded by Rockefeller grants of several billion dollars (in today’s money) beginning in the 1920s. Beardsley Ruml articulated the vision of joining the various social sciences into a results-oriented synthesis for population control. Out of these experiments came the modern focus group with the one-way mirror, mass polling, the polygraph, and mental tests for motivation, intelligence, loyalty, and aptitude. Psychologists learned how to monitor and quantify inner states, then how to create the state they wanted through stimulus-response conditioning. Later, drug experiments, psychosurgery, and cultural anthropology were added to the arsenal of techniques of control. More recently, mind-machine combinations and interactions, nanotechnology, and bioengineering were added to the psychological control arsenal. (more…)

Identity cleansing

Posted By on September 4, 2010

“If you are not aware of being manipulated, you are being manipulated.”

We are following up on our review of Descartes’ Error with a few helpful tips for undoing your liberal brainwashing and reclaiming your true identity.

First, understand that brain science is conducted by materialist determinists and so all theories about mind/brain interaction will be reductionist. Science assumes that all causes are materialist and all outcomes rely on the probability calculus. Scientists cannot operate any other way. Scientists cannot operate any other way and get funding. (more…)

Warning for America

Posted By on August 29, 2010

Warning For America From South Africa By Gemma Meyer (Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa.)

People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the gay rights movement). Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country. (more…)

Descartes’ Error, Part 2

Posted By on August 24, 2010

Review of Antonio R. Damasio, Descartes’ Error: Motion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994.

Science has devalued emotion because scientists believed emotion clouded reason or played no part in reasoning and was a function of the “lower brain.” Damasio is correcting this view by showing that feelings allow minding of the body and thus feelings form a frame of reference for images and thought interpretations. (more…)

Descartes’ Error, Part 1

Posted By on August 21, 2010

Brain science is flourishing, but it is yet in its adolescence, with many researchers offering wildly differing theories of the brain/mind connection. This is understandable because there is no such thing as scientific interpretation. All interpretation comes from existing worldviews projected upon data. As brain studies progress, many theories will be discarded, but at the moment there are way too many competing theories for us to cover in a post. Books have been written on this subject, and there is wide coverage on the net. (more…)