Debating a white future
The following quotes are from Takuan Seiyo, From Meccania to Atlantis:
“Islam’s shock troops in the West are the white ruling elites. The main enemy force is on the left flank. There are probably 30 million Muslims in Western Europe and perhaps 6 million in North America. But there are maybe 300 million leftists in Western Europe, and over 68 million Americans.”
“The society that swoons at transvestite politicians, gay marriage, homosexual indoctrination in schools and “empowerment” of men-hating Marxist women will know the test of Reality when its fertility rate is no longer 1.3 but 0.65.”
“60% of the Dutch people consider the importation of 2 million non-White immigrants, particularly Muslims, their country’s worst mistake since World War 2. Yet, the Netherlands’ main champion of national sanity, Geert Wilders, is persecuted relentlessly by that country’s ruling Body Snatcher cabal, and not even 1% of this wise-too-late majority of Dutchmen can mobilize to demonstrate in his support in front of the Dutch parliament.”
“In Europe too, the ruling elites know well how dumb, confused and docile the people have become after 50 years of Podism and rising standards of living. That’s why the electorate wasn’t even consulted in matters as crucially important as the establishment of Eurabia, massive Muslim immigration, and laws curtailing Freedom of Speech and enacted to spare the responsible Body Snatchers from criticism.”
“For that part of the population they haven’t replaced, they replaced its brain cells via a Long March through the schools and mass communication media.”
“You have to be a moron, an ignoramus not to be aware that you have seeded a future civil war, a major devaluation of social capital, a destruction of your own mother, your nation.”
“America is going to wake up after four or eight years of Obama administration to find, in the words of James Delingpole, “its pockets empty, its savings gone, its streets rife with crime and its traditional liberties circumscribed. And—the most important topic that every “conservative” pundit tiptoes around carefully—a 33% Latino and African segment of the population that votes reflexively socialist and anti-white.”
“In every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region.”
“Generation Y women (aged 18-29) distinguish themselves from all older generations of women (aged 30-70). These are the wombs from which generation Z will issue. After that, no more letters in the alphabet. The tidal wave of hysterical stupidity, having reached its nadir, will have crashed onto Brain Snatcher civilization.”
* * *
We haven’t visited Fjordman for a while, so we surfed over to take a look. Gates of Vienna is involved in a debate about the future of whites under the Euro-Med plan to flood Europe with Moslems and expand to North Africa and the Middle East. The commentators at Gates of Vienna understand that the Left is playing the leading role in the Islamification of Europe. The same is true in the United States, but here a strong anti-terrorist segment of public opinion forces the Left to appear to be strong defenders against Islamic terrorism to hide their real agenda. The Left doesn’t care about defending nations, they care about eliminating them and taking them over with the global dictatorship.
Of interest:
Human Rights Fundamentalism discusses the current state of thinking about human rights in the context of UN global directives. A careful analysis of how the Left hi-jacked individual rights and promoted new rights under the name “human rights” is lacking in this discussion. The human rights agenda is Communism, but big capitalism likes human rights because international enforcement paves the way for their success in entering and taking over Third World nations. The multinationals like it when the UN mandates uniform global standards and negotiates cultural differences in their favor. Human rights is cultural destruction and family destruction. It is the donkey work necessary to pave over the world so the elite dictatorship can rule easily.
The alternative to endless UN bureaucracies discussing ethnic and religious differences is, stay home in your own culture and leave everybody else alone. Global integration is an aggressive takeover agenda demanding global human uniformity. Various human rights appeals to ending poverty or genocide enlist your sympathies for a human rights agenda that is fundamentally anti-human and anti-culture.
There is a great irony in Communists promoting human rights. We hope you recognize this contradiction easily. Communist China is not going to end its genocide against the Tibetan people, and Barack Obama is not going to adopt any policy that stops this genocide. Meanwhile, both parties blather on about “human rights.”
Heeding Locke and Jefferson is the worst thing you can do. People don’t enter into societies, they are born into them. Jefferson was Illuminati, and a slaver. He admired Weishaupt, Robispierre, and Napoleon. Perpetual revolution is a phony principle, though we admit it has great appeal right at this moment when the takeover is so advanced. Our chapter “The Illuminati in America” will end any idealism you have about Jefferson or his philosophy. Jefferson was known in his lifetime as a liar and clever deceiver, a betrayer of President Washington while vice-president, an admirer of the French Terror.
There are two basic problems with the slogan “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” First, the slogans are given by people who don’t really believe in those values. They are propaganda in the service of the New World Order. Second, this slogan does not embody man’s highest values. The purpose of the slogan was to mold the variety of emerging secular values into a single slogan that would shape human behavior and make the masses easier to control. Readers of The Hidden Masters understand that the Enlightenment was an exercise in controlling the masses. Don’t think in slogans, it won’t get you anywhere.
The only reason you believe in freedom and democracy and happiness is because they taught you this stuff in school with a simple slogan that is easier to refer to than any other human value. Your homework exercise is to self-examine to bring your true values to the forefront of your consciousness. Make a simple slogan if it helps you remember your real values. Lots of things are more important than the pursuit of happiness. In fact, the pursuit of happiness will actually make you into a jerk.
The Christians who fled to America didn’t elevate happiness. America was taken over by Enlightenment radicals. Its destiny was to be governed by two political parties who were more radical than the people. We don’t admire any of the founding fathers. Most of them were motivated by greed. They called it freedom to make it sound noble. They managed to enlist about one-third of the colonists in their revolution, but the majority of the people did not favor revolution. America is a strange country ruled by two parties who are more radical than the people. That is why there hasn’t been a good or great U.S. president. The only president we admire is John Quincy Adams, and we admire him mainly for warning that Freemasonry is evil, cannot be reformed, and should be abolished.
The founders basically imitated the English form of government but replaced the king with a president. Excuse us if we don’t consider this arrangement to be the work of geniuses.
Conservatives need to dig deeper than the founders to find a genuine conservatism. The founders were masonic Enlightenment radicals. Thinking within their framework of ideas will only keep you trapped in false radical concepts.
Enlightenment thinking, the social contract and the default value of liberty, cannot be our baseline conservative value rallying point. The Enlightenment was not conservative, it was radical. The present awful state of affairs comes from Enlightenment thinking. Enlightenment thinking is false. We will explain this in more detail in future posts.
Look deeper than the American Revolution for genuine conservative values. We happen to like the Greek city-state as a conservative model. Big democracies are unworkable. Small democracies could work.
We really like the guys at Gates of Vienna and consider them our allies. But they seem mired in Enlightenment, and we suspect they don’t know who the Illuminati were. We need to send them a copy of The Hidden Masters. It won’t help them to think without the best understanding of history it is possible to get.
A View From the Right has a manifesto of sorts, at least one that explains the problem. We think Richard W. has the right analysis of the problem, and we’re following his logic toward independent states. Ah, but there are many a slip between the idea and the execution of the idea. The federal government won’t let the states go without a fight. The feds will militarily occupy any state that attempts to exert its sovereignty. We think the right strategy is for the states to resist the socialist programs without declaring independence from the union. As time goes by, the most liberal states will fall into total bankruptcy, more people will leave the failing liberal states, and more people will become aware of Obama’s lies and his anti-white agenda.
Actually, we think all of this thinking is out of date. You can’t revive the ideas of 1776 to resist the challenge of 2010. The Obama Maoists are not King George. The issues are not taxes, free trade, and self-government, the issues are unpayable debt, socialist control, corrupt government, global federalism, anti-white takeover. And we want to add, the peculiar combination of new technologies promoting visual information combined with the liberal education program devaluing literacy and reading.
The founders fought each other bitterly and disagreed about every important issue. They raised an army and got funding from abroad. They split into bitterly opposed political parties right at the beginning. Federalism was a coup. We are more persuaded by the anti-federalist arguments than the federalist arguments. The federal government was vulnerable to takeover by corrupt parties, the money interests, and the socialists. Why would this model be a recipe for success? What corrective are the “small government conservatives” going to apply to the Constitution to make sure the takeover never happens again? And how are they going to come up with the corrective while thinking in the slogans of Freemasonry?
At the moment all the conservative talkers are promoting the founding myths as the alternative to socialist takeover and the bankruptcy of endless debt. This appeal appears to be freedom and economic sanity as compared with the Progressive lies and bad economic policies, and would be a vast improvement over the current trendlines leading to endless crisis. But times have changed. The technology has changed, the culture has changed. Trying to return to an unpopulated 1770s America ruled by idealized founding fathers isn’t going to appeal to teenagers on iMacs who are colonized under the slogan of equality. More importantly, electing Republican politicians won’t undo the anti-white agenda baked into law or repeal free trade agreements or end illegal migration or reverse the population decline caused by feminism. A Republican electoral victory theoretically only halts the worst crimes of the Left, the debt spiral and possibly, the looting of the Treasury, if the Right can be educated to consider Wall Street’s crimes.
The problem with a return to founding values is that America has a long history of changing those values by constitutional amendment. The “small government, reduce spending” model does not come to grips with the more profound political problem, that Lincoln defined freedom as equality and thereby opened the vote to the ignorant masses. Who is going to tell the masses they are too dumb to vote? No one, it’s a recipe for losing elections.
Who is going to run for office on the platform of opposing the federal government’s land grab in the Western states, or the necessity of redrawing all the electoral districts because they have been gerrymandered to keep politicians in office for 40 years, or breaking up the big banks, or banning global corporations and repealing free trade agreements so that Americans can get a job? Who is going to advocate the dissolution of the public school system? What politician is going to ban unions, ban Freemasonry, dissolve the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome, and expose our recent presidents as corrupt New World Order traitors? And that would just be a start.
The founders never believed that America could become a multicultural and multiracial nation dominated by minorities. They never foresaw what racial integration combined with feminism could do to destroy society. If they thought about culture at all, they simply assumed that whites would form the dominant culture and all others would aspire to adopt it. How do you deal with their unforeseen error now that whites are becoming a minority, and are permanently discriminated against, in an era of declining white birthrates?
The idea of the civil society promoted by the Enlightenment thinkers is a bad idea. Their formula, “individuals acting as citizens” destroys society and culture. The Progressive mass society and the degenerate liberal culture built upon the civil society idea. They are the worst possible outcome of the flow of ideas constituting Western intellectual history.
White people aren’t going to save themselves from racist discrimination or demographic annihilation by embracing “equality” or “democracy” or trying to model a movement based on the election of candidates who are under the spell of masonic propaganda slogans.
We think the right tack is to point out the true evil agenda of the criminal elites, offer a superior history, teach people how to think, and hope that good ideas for racial preservation can spread to a small elite who can become leaders. But we have to admit, we are running out of time for this strategy to work. We are stumped. So are the guys at the Gates of Vienna.
If an easy solution were at hand, everybody would know it by now. More thinking is required. But we can agree to unite to throw the socialists out as a good first step, and we need to do that right now before we are completely taken over and powerless. This means, cooperating with those small government politicians who think the founding fathers created some wonderful blueprint for government, even though we know better. The first order of business is to overthrow the New World Order socialists who are spending us into bankruptcy. Then, let a hundred flowers bloom.
By the way, Takuan Seiyo is a white guy living in Japan who admires the Japanese for not allowing multiracial integration and for defending their traditional culture. The irony of our times is, you have to flee outside Europe and the United States to find good values. The problem is, flight doesn’t begin to deal with the socialist takeover. Fleeing leaves the field open to the worst among us, the corrupt New World Order traitors and the special interests kept afloat by the federal government gravy train.
The key question of high interest is, does fleeing or fighting give the white race the best chance for survival?
About The Author
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!