We are examining Andrei Codrescu, The Disappearance of the Outside, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990, in search of models for successful exile. Codrescu’s situation of exile was not exactly the same as ours today, so we are making comments about parallels and contrasts.

“The philosophy of the Exile is that life is a Fall from Paradise, and history is the continual displacement of man from his home. It forms an ‘atemporal and aspatial identity.’ It elevates escape and motion. Exile is the place ‘where culture is not.’ It is the condition of being Outside. The positive result is that one can view all cultures without being invested in them, so one grasps a total understanding. The negative result is that there is no connection with or commitment to existing structures.”

Codrescu is being a little Romantic here. The problem is not a fall but infiltration of American institutions by radical subversives. This Communist occupation was naked and open in Romania, but in the United States the Marxists have adopted American democratic language in their propaganda. One can criticize the propaganda and lay bare the lies, but after while this exercise becomes repetitive and less useful. Everyone knows the socialists are lying, the problem today is that many well-intentioned people participate in the institutions the socialists have taken over. They must be nudged to recognize their true condition, exile in their own country. “Escape and motion” would open the unbridgeable divide between good and evil for all to see.

Codrescu views the struggle for independence from the Soviet Empire as one that will eventually bring these Eastern European countries into a featureless global village of the West.

Codrescu gives no hint that he was familiar with Stalin’s plan to form the European Union and the United Nations, but his small miss, to the end game of the global village, is close enough to Stalin’s totalitarian vision that it makes no significant difference.

“The idea of Europe was destroyed in Europe but preserved in Romania, a satellite of Europe. This enraged the Left, who have abandoned the idea that man can be helped to understand himself and his life through literature. The intellectual center is uninhabited, abandoned, and its appearance at the fringe arouses anger on the Left.”

The Left still gets extremely angry whenever some intellectual life appears in their wasteland.

“The Left also appropriated the idea of exile and assigned it to Lenin and Stalin. These heroes of the revolution were promoted with massive propaganda campaigns as wise and idealistic. Stalin’s name appeared on all the textbooks in the Soviet Union. The naïve children must have been led to believe that he knew everything.”

Actually Stalin was a bank robber and train robber, Lenin was first a landowner and then a thief and an extortionist in Europe during his exile. Both were cold, heartless, vicious personalities, the logical outcome of believing in socialist materialism. All socialists are gangsters, experts in theft.

But as socialism rewrites its history to exclude Stalin and Lenin, the exile has no particular standing with today’s Marxist media. They are obsessed with power and turn gangsters into celebrities. They don’t uphold exile as noble rebellion, they are fascinated with the International Conference. That is because rebellion is no longer needed. The teachers and bureaucrats and social scientists are all Marxists now, the institutions have control over the masses. The squabbling at international conferences is between factions of the Left. Factionalism is the permanent feature of the Marxist ideology.

Notice, today, that in Greece the socialists who are losing their jobs are shifting their support to the Communists rather than blaming the socialists for bankrupting their country with overspending. The socialists who are losing their government jobs should be supporting an honest small-scale capitalist economy in an independent Greece, but they are addicted to government. This is the level of stupidity and weakness socialism causes.

“The center in the West is the electronic media. Its discourse is mechanical. Its greatest challenge is the exile. Art-workers feed the electronic beast with quick and painless entertainment, ‘looks’ for the market. These writers express their self-loathing by increased anti-materialist idealism that causes cycles of revolt and the production of new styles. The medium only cares that there be no gaps, which would allow time for thought and the possibility of reentry of the marginalized.”

For example, imagine the scandal to the Left if all the white males who had been denied jobs because of affirmative action or censored from political correctness were to take over the media and tell their stories. This simply cannot be allowed.

“The true artist, the exile who is not part of the media, must invent an entirely new world of imagination that cannot be swallowed by the mechanical machine of media equality. The exile should be doomed to failure, should be broken by his exile. The only thing that keeps him afloat is faith. This is in contrast to the art worker, whose attitude is entirely loss of faith. The exiled artist represents a pure currency, while all the art workers’ styles inflate in money value. To gain weight, art workers borrow the character of the exile or the attitude of the exile.”

In the East, the beast was the bureaucracy of words, the total blanketing of everyone with endless lies in a prison of words. In the West the beast of lies is the media stream of fantasy images and the associated image industries. But we must also include the official bureaucracies, the schools, the political parties, the hidden funded network of cadre activists, the lobbyists, the government-corporation nexus of cooperation.

“Kafka is the artist who guards the crossroads between official reality and the exiled nomad under Communism. The bureaucrats are the interior consciousness of the new interiors, the gas chambers, listening posts, and prison camps. They do not know how to live Outside. They are bugs. They know the maps of the labyrinth, the organization of the camps, the ministries, the assembly lines, the spooks and counteragents. Kafka is an unwanted tourist who maps the new space. He is the father of dissident literature.”

“The bureaucrat takes on the faux personality of adult self-importance masking emptiness. His job is to cover all cracks mapping the interior.”

The weakness of the socialist activists and true believers is their hollowness, the brokenness of their inner lives. This theme has yet to be exploited in American literature. Someone must write the novel of socialist bureaucrats who are really just immature adolescents bent on serving their own addictions and perversions. Perhaps the biography of Bill Clinton will cover this theme. Whoever does it will open new comedic ground and expose the Marxist “comedians” as poseurs.

“Exiles map the space of the controlled interior, at least the part they know. This knowledge quickly exhausts the bureaucratic secretion of the media, which is a facade of fantasy nostalgia. The literature of exile is written according to different architectures of memory. The contents pour the Inside into the Outside and poison it with a moral crusade of anger. This process of freeing memory conflicts with the official bureaucratic project of redefining the Outside as Inside or at least neutralizing the Outside. Both of these literatures are in conflict with technology, which seeks the optimum innovation with no restraint.”

In the Western academies, Marxist deconstructionists and postmodernists are neutralizing the autonomy of all literature as much as possible through denial of the possibility of experience giving rise to truth and denial of the legitimacy of all previous literary works.

“The Marxists believe the Outside disappeared at the end of the nineteenth century. Since Rimbaud, all Outside literature is a repetition of previous literature or self-referential, unless it maps the interior of the totalitarian labyrinth.”

But please don’t allow the Marxists to define literature for you. Marxists don’t believe in literature or reading. Reading creates individuals.

“Marxists, who believe that man is merely a collection of molecules accidentally formed from impersonal forces, cannot imagine. That is, they are literal-minded and cannot move beyond the concrete and the abstractions of ideology. They have no capacity to locate anything outside their system.”

That’s why listening to Marxists pontificate on TV is so funny. They are utterly clueless and clueless that they are clueless. That’s because Marxism forces the closing of all systems, the closing of all minds.

Like Freemasons, the Marxists do not know the meaning of their rituals.

“Their history is pure ideology, pure erasing and rewriting in formulas. They have no interest in history, only their texts rewriting history. They can only produce interiors. They have even eliminated the worker from history. The worker is only a symbol of Marxist legitimacy. They are not revolutionaries but state bureaucrats.”

This turning point of Marxist propaganda occurred in 1957, when Khrushchev, in the midst of de-Stalinization, changed the term “worker” to the term “people.” Khrushchev was well aware that the workers were becoming well off in America and Europe and could not be relied upon to serve the revolution.

“Barthes and the deconstructionists extended the text to everything by asserting that the world can be read. The world is a text without a single author, though some parts of it are authorized and some are not. But the unauthorized parts that have not been rewritten in official legalese still exist as Outside. The Outside is unstable, and it contains escape routes. Moreover, it exerts pressure on the official Inside. The purpose of the censorship is to guard against an eruption.”

Notice that the Left allows eruptions on the Left because these can be easily controlled. These eruptions don’t count. The real eruptions are on the Right.

The practical question of interest is whether the Outside contains any pressure points or escape routes today. The intellectual question of interest has to do with arguing with the socialist cosmos, the definition of the entire world as socialist world order.

Semiotics as a discipline is a form of censorship, that is, it is Marxist ideology projected upon all forms of communication, even forms of communication that the Marxist semiotician invents. Censorship doesn’t work perfectly, there are tea party eruptions. But contrast this timid protest with the organized Communist riots in the streets of Europe, Madison, Wisconsin, or Philadelphia. Real violence. The controlled protests of the Left are destructive, well-funded, well-organized, stable and persisting. The controlled protests by the Communist labor organizers are more effective and enduring than the real protest, the tea party.

The tea party has decided to become irrelevant by turning its attention to the primary elections. With this turn, the talk of secession by the states disappeared. Those who believe that elections matter must remember that the voting districts are gerrymandered and the unions count the votes. How many elections in the United States have been rigged? Too many to count.

There has never been a genuine eruption against socialism in the United States, but there were genuine eruptions in Prague and Hungary.

“However, the exiles write in a language that has disappeared, and their values, that which they reference, disappear quickly. The exiles must compete with exiles such as Lenin, who returned and made himself the hero, the new king. Exiles bring tales of the Outside and make it amenable to further conquest. Their particular territories can then be colonized, turning Outside into Inside. The text of the exile is turned over to the bureaucratic knowledge-worker for imitation and subversion. It becomes really just a representation or hallucination, which becomes the official version, and colonizers are sent to settle the hallucination. Barbed wire, photographs, study groups, filing cabinets for records, maps, raiding parties of journalists are sent. This colonization of anything different becomes a commodity. If it cannot be colonized, it is not shown on TV. It becomes impossible, absurd, denied.”

Actually the video is changing this situation somewhat. The real dissidents can videotape their tea party rallies, or Obamaville tent cities. Today the video has substituted for the literature of dissent that prevailed under Soviet and Eastern European Communism.

The problem for dissenters and exiles is infiltration and disinformation by the official spies, who want to manufacture pseudo-dissidents and control them. The tea party immediately faced the problem of Leftist infiltration and provocation, accompanied by video cameras. The pure literary exile is rare because writing is now rare.

“The exile ends up feeding his words to the official spies, who then send colonizing missions to incorporate resistance movements into the control bureaucracies.”

“The true exiles do not read their new surroundings into the official record but use oblique strategies of nomadic mystery. But it is increasingly difficult to assume another identity, to be heard only by those whom one wishes to address. The best strategy is to create texts that resemble official texts, the corresponding strategy to disinformation campaigns by the center.”

We are still contemplating “oblique strategies of nomadic mystery.” This sounds to us like inventing a new code language known only to the true dissenters. But writing seems Romantic today, in the era of direct violent confrontations and internet video publishing.

“The imagination is the opponent of the virtual. The virtual seeks to replace imagination, to defeat it, make it dwindle. Programming replaces creativity.”

The imagination is of central importance in defining a nonsocialist world-cosmos.

(Henri Matisse wrote, “As long as we can create, we are not defeated” during the Nazi occupation of France. But let’s not be naive. There is no fascist cavalry to rescue us from Communism.)

“The exile imagines the nothing that exists behind all the official simulacra.”

Actually, we do have a good idea of the nothing that exists behind all the official simulacra. When they throw party at the White House, they dance to black illuminati music. They drink and do drugs and congratulate themselves on their good luck. Obama golfs and travels and accepts Nobel Peace Prizes and gets gay blowjobs. He doesn’t pay attention to issues he’s not interested in. There is nothing inside the hollow men but perversions, addictions, and greed, and this emptiness is the scandal the Left cannot discuss.

“The image-destroying imagination of the exile must be generative and unframed like fire. The exile consciousness is sober, monastic. His best strategy is the disruption of the joining function in the collage. The true art form of resistance is anti-collage.”

“Escape must be imagined or all is lost. The next generation will live in a dystopia without any access to history.”

Codrescu’s “next generation” is this generation. Codrescu could not have foreseen how degraded the masses would become between 1968 and 2011. They do not desire honest institutions, they desire drugs, subsidies, vulgarity, spectacle, pure escape.

“One must avoid feeding one’s words to the center.”

The literature of exile in the United States has been the literature of ghosting, the strategy for dealing with feminists, the rude radical Negroes, white race-traitors, and immigrant gangs. Stepping around, avoiding contamination, dropping out, rising above, choosing one’s route carefully. Refusing to support those businesses involved with the anti-male and anti-white agenda. Seeking rural refuges. Thinking about saving something that might persist through these Dark Ages and be of use to a young man of good spirit born in the far-distant future who might be curious enough to sift through the false history and propaganda, discover the history of human greatness, and wonder how it all went wrong.

The true spirit of exile under Communism involved mapping the interiors of the totalitarian media and bureaucracies, pointing to various escape routes, linking of those Outside in common purpose, documentation of the crimes and perversions of the Insiders, and a positive culture of disruption.

We are still pondering Codrescu’s term “anti-collage” and searching for effective resistance strategies. For one thing, the reestablishment of the true narrative of the historical links among all the subversive groups, The Hidden Masters Who Rule the World. Connecting the dots. Increasingly, for us, anti-collage involves debunking disinformation and establishing the true historical narrative. Let’s recall the quote from Milan Kundera we cited  months ago, “We are compelled to forget by the collage style of the mass media.” Anti-collage promotes remembering. What must we remember? Who took us over, how they did it. There was a time when life was lived outside socialist control systems. People fought and died opposing socialism. Remember the heroes of the struggle.

There is no educated audience of any size devoted to resistance of the New World Order today. We tip our cap to the tea party for showing a little spirit, but they lack knowledge of the history of planning for the New World Order in the American colonies. Most of them admire Thomas Jefferson and the other Illuminati revolutionaries. They think in terms of Illuminati slogans. Many of them support feminism, free trade bureaucracies, the black civil rights takeover, the gay agenda, free speech, public schools, the United Nations, foreign wars, and any con artist claiming to be green.

The exile maps the Outside of the socialist prison camp. We shall define the Outside as any country that did not experience the Enlightenment, has not signed free trade agreements, and has banned television. It is there we shall contemplate tales of nomadic mystery and anti-collage.

We are using the word “exile” to refer to the victims of socialism. “Alienation” is the term socialists use to refer to the workers under capitalism.

Capitalism is exploitive of workers insofar as the workers are underpaid or mistreated. These abuses have been fixed in the West but remain under Communism. Communism mistreats its workers and underpays them worse than capitalism. The only reason this is not at the forefront of your consciousness is because cameras are not allowed inside Cuban, North Korean, or Venezuelan factories. Pay attention to the stories of suicides among Chinese workers and study their working conditions if you need to grasp how evil socialism is. Today the leading corporations are following the model of Soviet forced labor camps by locating their factories in Communist and socialist countries under the terms of “free trade” agreements.

The Social Democrats would like to pretend that the horrors of Communism belong to the past. They belong to the present and the future. The Left is extremely anxious and defensive about their Communist past. Most of them are not smart enough to have learned that Bolshevik means Social Democrat. The Fabians supported Stalin, and lied to protect his dictatorship. There is no such thing as a Social Democrat who will draw a line against Communism and fight.

The failure of the liberal education system to focus on the crimes of the Soviet Union is another reason the horrors of socialism are not at the front of your consciousness.

Here we’ll give a nod to Glenn Beck, who pointed out succintly on his FOX TV program that the idea of prison camps as a “solution” to “overpopulation” comes from Fabian Socialists such as George Bernard Shaw. Shaw and the other British Fabians supported Stalin’s prison camps and genocides. The wolf in sheep’s clothing is still the official symbol of Fabian Socialism.

The Communists considered the “alienated masses” to be so stupid that they were supposed to be guided by the Marxist cadre and the party line. But remember the old Russian joke, “the government pretends to pay us and we pretend to work.” Everyone in Russia knew that Communism was a disastrous failure.

In Russia the population that managed to survive its genocides and prison camps became addicted to alcohol, riddled with sex diseases, and distrustful of everyone. It is very difficult to build anything once socialism takes over because the entire population becomes forcibly degraded. Russia is now paying women to bear children in order to avoid permanent population decline.

We have found it difficult to research the history of resistance to socialism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This should be the first topic taught in public school. Instead, so little has been written on this topic that we do not have a solid basis for understanding how resistance was organized. But one thing is certain, the resistance was not strong enough to effect anything of significance. The best it could do was preserve literature and form a black market.

It’s important to hold the history of Communism close to the forefront of your consciousness if you are going to become a resister. The rebellion against Russian and Eastern European Communism is the best model we have. It did produce one great result, the 1989 “Velvet Revolution” in Prague. Communism fell before mass protest along with other favorable developments. However, Prague would not have been a successful resistance if the Soviet leaders had decided to repress it.

Now that the United States has been taken over, there is no government that can counter socialism. There will be no escape from the socialist New World Order. The plans for erasing national borders and forming supergovernments to rule over regional unions is proceeding. Debt crisis and financial crisis are opportunities to introduce more centralized control mechanisms. No socialist nation is scaling back its police state bureaucracy.

The exile is the carrier of superior human values living in the degraded Marxist pseudo-culture. Your present condition is that of exile under global socialism, or brainwashed useful idiot.

Review of Andrei Codrescu, The Disappearance of the Outside, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.

Codrescu was a bright Romanian dissident writer who took exile in the United States in the 1960s. His description of life under Communism provides a model for our own exile inside the United States.

But Codrescu made an important error. Intoxicated with the possibility of freedom, he interpreted the chaos of the 1960s cultural rebellion as freedom and respect for ethnic traditions. Today we know that the Cultural Marxists and the CIA were directing the rebellion and it really wasn’t oriented toward freedom but toward socialist takeover. All of those who were interested in “radical liberation” were ensnared in cultural socialism.

The element of Communist control that defined public attitudes in Romania was official censorship. Of course, the Communist authorities were involved in more than censorship, but Codrescu does not describe the official police state terror policies, he focuses on censorship. As we read Codrescu must be able to make the link between censorship (and worse) under Communism in the East and the power centers of censorship and disinformation (and worse) in the West — media, bureaucracies, politicians, parties, unions, and teachers.

“The perfect system of censorship created an atmosphere of boredom and thus gave rise to an appetite for the forbidden. The censors compiled lists of forbidden books that then beckoned everyone interested in knowledge.”

The forbidden subject in the West is not capitalism and democracy but conspiracy history, the history of Communism. The Left does not fear capitalism and democracy, they are easily taken over. The Left fears fascist armies and white resistance and defunding. Any group the Left labels as “crazy” can be our model for resistance. Resisters should try to become what the Left fears most.

“Censorship was also self-censorship of anyone who wanted to survive in the official society. The state of society became insecurity in the face of the forbidden views, and the attachment of wild and transcendent hope to the mysteries of what was forbidden.”

Holding wild and transcendent hopes is not the emotional state of the exile in the West. Capitalism and democracy and science hold no mystery for us, we know how they play out and serve socialism.

Codrescu likens the daily changes in censorship to weather requiring a weather report, an underground stream of gossip about what was allowed and what was forbidden.

Today this “underground stream of gossip” is above ground. TV reports on the Left’s speech codes and punishments for independent thought. Schools are brainwashing factories. Bureaucrats regulate. The public square is a liberal wasteland.

“Writers living in the country were often forbidden to write anything and had their previous works erased from history. Many writers shuffled between prison and menial jobs. Their persecution made them heroes. Meanwhile, the officially approved intellectuals in the universities had to invent ever more conservative forms that were empty of content and did not refer to anything. These, the self-censored, were alcoholics who reluctantly appeared at the Writers Union conferences and then left as soon as possible so that they could drink. The hack writers in the bureaucracies and the newspapers were officially elevated and put on display as a kind of ghost of a writer. The official writers constituted a fake folk art, the kitsch horror of socialism.”

The journalists and professors in the West today are similar hacks, with or without the alcohol. These pseudo-intellectuals are paraded at Left-wing conferences where party-line slogans and useless analysis are dispensed. For the masses who can’t make it to the conferences, the Jon Stewart show, Charlie Rose, PBS.

“This situation led to hermeticism, to writing in code, writing in secret, keeping the links with the past alive but calculating the risk involved, dissecting propaganda with surrealism, but always in danger of becoming the object of the next crackdown.”

Notice Codrescu’s error here, believing Surrealism was a way to break the propaganda stream. Surrealism is Communism.

“Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich appeared during the Khrushchev thaw. We know now that the thaw was calculated and controlled by Khrushchev, a pseudo-thaw to support pseudo-de-Stalinization. Reading was allowed when a break with the past was necessary. But in 1974 Solzhenitsyn was arrested and deported to West Germany. For him personally it was a trial because he was unfamiliar with the twentieth century. He was the embodiment of the moral nineteenth century Russian literary tradition now exposed to the world outside Russia. This was a continuation of the Slavophile mystical anarchist debate that had been interrupted by Lenin. He was the inside turned out.”

The very definition of cultural subversion and corruption is, of course, turning the genuine culture from the inside to the outside, to exile.

Of interest: 200 Years Together Wolfgang Strauss, The End of the Legends

New World Order University and the anti-EU forces in Europe represent the inside of the European tradition turned outside. We have difficulty absorbing mystical anarchism, so we just refer to “European traditions.” Actually, anything is better than socialism, so we’re not trying to set limits on what alternatives you can access.

“But the inside of Stalinist Russia, inside the prison camps, was where the intellectual energy was. Here was concentrated the hunger, the degradation, the torture, the heroism and the brutality and the triumph of the human spirit under Communism. This was the only thing worth knowing about life under Communism, that under the worst conditions some managed to express the human spirit. Inside the prison system was where the freedom of the mind was being expressed.”

“The handwritten and typed manuscripts that passed hand to hand were called the literature of samizdat. Khrushchev’s dissidents sent to the West for display were pseudo-dissidents. Real dissidents were hard to find; the system demanded that show dissidents be manufactured and suffer Soviet justice, otherwise the machinery of suppression might go slack.”

The socialist system requires that dissenters be publicly humiliated. So far there is a sufficient supply of dissenters to whip up the masses in disgust and outrage that someone opposes Communism. At the moment the focus of humiliation is any white guy who says “nigger,” prays, or smokes cigarettes.

Codrescu embraced exile as the promise of freedom in the tradition of the famous Romanian exiles, which included Tristan Tzara, Eugene Ionesco, Mircea Eliade, Constantin Brancusi, and Emil Cioran. Physical exile for Codrescu formed a kind of Platonic state, an international free idea state. “However, one must reside in a nation, which involves bureaucratic processing, learning a new language, and the likelihood of cultural isolation. Nabokov had written about the problem of living among ‘French aborigines…as flat and transparent as figures cut out of cellophane’ with which no real communication was possible.”

But Codrescu did not complain about the Americans as cellophane figures. He imagined his exile had led him to freedom.

We have no such illusions now that the world is becoming a closed system.

Codrescu arrived in an America in the 1960s in which pseudo-exile was the condition of the young who had been hypnotized by Cultural Marxism. America was a culture of fads rather than values, and the celebration of ethnicity was an enduring fad at the end of the twentieth century. Moreover, exile from the mother culture was the self-chosen state of the American intellectual. Codrescu easily imagined that he was joining other exiles in exile because he was oriented toward the fantasy of a benign Left.

But today the campaigns against genuine culture have succeeded so thoroughly that Leftists can no longer pose as exiles. The genuine exiles are all on the Right now. We are not convinced that there is an American mother culture anymore. Perhaps some sharp student could take on the project of defining the elements of a common white culture in today’s Communist diversity wasteland.

In Part 2 we will explore whether Codrescu’s experience can help us become more effective exiles.

Mindweapons in Ragnarok caught our attention with a nice piece of anti-feminist propaganda. This is how you do it, boys, with conceptual art rather than essays on the history of Communism and population reduction. The next step is to get these images, or something similar, up on a billboard. Pool your money, do a small project, get noticed.

Mangan’s has a short post on clueless conservatives and the impossibility of saving marriage. Mangan’s blames conservatives for not offering a more robust opposition to feminism; now they are reaping the whirlwind with social destruction while more men are adopting the marriage strike and other female avoidance strategies. We agree, but opposing feminism is a difficult job. They have control of the legal system as well as quotas in government, education, and the corporations. We see many stories on the web about conservative teachers being squeezed out of jobs. Notice, in this regard, that Pat Buchanan was recently banned from MSNBC. Even high-status conservatives can’t overcome liberal oppression.

Digression: The Chinese do a better job of fighting back against black aggression than whites do.

Chariot of Reaction proposes a new type of marriage contract to fix the perverse legal system in the United States. Advising men on choosing a suitable mate, he concludes that about 10 percent of American women might be suitable for marriage. There aren’t many good old-fashioned girls anymore. All women are feminized now because the institutions are controlled by feminism.

Social Pathologist argues in his post Conservative Tectonics that flaws in traditional society created pressures that led to radical movements. This is a flawed argument. It is liberal thinking. It is what the liberals want you to think. Social change does not occur according to Social Pathologist’s model of social pressures, it occurs by conspiracy from elites and is imposed by subversion.

We agree that you cannot reset to “initial conditions” without being specific about exactly which initial conditions you want to reset to. We specifically reject Israel, Egypt, Babylon, and Greece as traditional models. The society worth imitating is Western European paganism as described in John Michell’s At the Center of the World, Polar Symbolism Discovered in Celtic, Norse, and Other Ritualized Landscapes (London, Thames and Hudson, 1994). You can still find this model in rural village America and Europe if you try. But you are surrounded by the evil power of the socialist New World Order.

This is Traditionalism without mechanization, and we recognize that folks love electrification, automobiles, and modern medicine. The trick is not to destroy the society for the sake of economy, and certainly not for a global economy. If you are drawn toward the White Village model, you must control local politics, put up barriers to entry, buy guns, and ban liberal media.

The error of the Left, and of Social Pathologist, is that “the natural order of female desire” is something to be respected. Social conservatives do not idealize women or ignore their sexuality, especially now in the modern media age when liberal consciousness is entirely sexualized and disgusting liberal sluts are media role models.

You have to ban Romance literature, especially novels that glorify adultery. This line of culture control is true conservatism. Conservatives who believe in free speech, free expression, free press, liberty, equality, fraternity, and the rights of man are radicals, not conservatives.

Social Pathologist’s post Aenemia criticizes the Christian/Romantic view of love as too ignorant of libido. Actually we believe many Christian counselors are aware of this phenomenon and attempt to correct deficits when they present. The libido/seduction/adultery theme dominates modern liberal literature. The stereotypical character conflict is the closed, rigid, puritanical man married to the life-loving, adventurous woman, who eventually finds her fulfillment elsewhere. Madame Bovary was an important literary model, and D.H. Lawrence exploited the theme.

This theme could easily be countered by a literature that describes divorce and what comes after as a less-than-fulfilling adventure leading to social pathology and social dissolution. But social statistics describe the broken family pathology in such grim detail that facts are now more powerful than any counterculture literature could be. We are now walking around in the feminist post-catastrophe wasteland. The genius of the socialists is, they will make a big-government welfare state out of the destruction they have caused.

Digression: On being a reactionary. Sober thinking. Chariot believes the brainwashed socialist masses can be persuaded to become more noble, but we doubt that any superior idea can penetrate their fog.

From his post Whittaker Chambers: The Failure of Conservatism: “As mentioned previously by Chambers, Socialism (and its bastard brother Fascism) did not arise in a vacuum, rather they were a  cognitive response to the social crises of the times. They were an attempt to solve the problem and hence were proactive remedial proscriptions and offered hope. The fact that they were eventual quack remedies is irrelevant in terms of their effect to elicit societal transformation, since what they offered was hope to multitudes in a promise for a better world.”

No, actually, they were conspiracies and counter-conspiracies, not attempts to solve problems, and this failure to grasp the conspiratorial nature of history is the key fact that leads Social Pathologist to false theorizing about “society’s flaws leading to the success of revolutionary movements.” Social Pathologist is a strange dog, a Catholic fascinated with social science and theorizing about society yet apparently unfamiliar with the history of the Catholic literature exposing the conspiracy of Freemasonry. We hope this important history is not entirely lost to young Catholics. We appreciate the value of reason, but your reasoning is only as good as your knowledge base and worldview. Reasoning based on social science concepts is a liberal dead-end.

There is nothing wrong with libidinally satisfying a woman, but her temporary emotional state is not a supreme social value.  The larger point is, one cannot build a society based on the satisfaction of the libido, one can only build a society by controlling it.

All men should learn how to satisfy a woman sexually, but that isn’t what Game is about.

Game is a scientific study of seduction, and seduction is not a conservative art or of any social value. The proponents of Game see it as a solution to feminist privileges over men. It is, in a way, a reversing of their legal power advantage, but gamers ignore what happens after the seduction. Usually, nothing good to write home about. Seducing a liberal woman is pointless.

And, by the way, the idea that successful seducers are all alphas is baloney. Most of them are low-level con artists.

But there is value in self-confidence in handling women, and men’s websites provide valuable knowledge for the confused. We don’t believe in generalized “solutions” as relationships and marriage are dominated by individual preferences, goals, and life experiences.

We like the idea of grading one’s dating status using a number, and the advice not to venture outside your league. We like the advice to learn about women’s psychology. We like the advice to initiate encounters and just see what happens, as long as you avoid liberal women. The most important point is, if you don’t dominate the woman, you will be lost in her web of manipulation. And, how she feels at this moment doesn’t really matter that much, learn how to move her emotional state. It’s pretty easy.

We recognize wide variations in preferences and proclivities. Some men are ruled by their sex drive their entire lives; some aren’t. Some want to build resistance, some are just marking time where they are, some want to flee.

We also recognize that reason falls away if one falls into romance.

You don’t need to take a Game seminar to learn how to handle women. Watch how Bogart handles Bacall in To Have and Have Not.

And guys, it’s OK not to have any success with women. Your social environment is a wasteland. Think about all the trouble you are saving yourself. There are lots of interesting things to do in life that don’t involve women.

Of interest:

Rex Patriarch appears to be a new site. We are glad to see new sites popping up to replace the ones that go down. Solo blogging is not a recipe for success, there isn’t enough positive feedback. Rex has the right baseline.

The Spearhead has caught the vibe and is putting something into it.

Alcuin struggles against feminism, the modern secular wasteland.

Foseti writes about conservative issues but hasn’t figured out the Jew bankster angle.

Collapse thinks in terms of Catholic conservatism.

Complementarian Loners. This ‘n that.

What Men Are Saying About Women. Reports from Australia. Nice effort.

Foreign Women Only. Creative, amusing. The opposition to feminism is so weak because you have to go along with women’s privilege in every public organization. Most men will surrender to earn a living, what else would you expect?

Single Dude Travel. If it’s not working where you are, it might work somewhere else.

Ghost Nation. Because we always want to hear about England, and he’s livelier than we are.

What Men Think of Women. Lively and prolific.

There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle. But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it):

International Men’s Organisation.

The difference between the United States and England is, the English know that they are taken over by Freemasonry and the Illuminati.

If you don’t know the link between Freemasonry and feminism, start this course over again at the beginning and catch up. There is no point in thinking about these issues with the wrong set of concepts, you’ll just go around in a small circle and end up nowhere, victimized by liberal thinking.

By the way, we will stop selling books from this website soon. Last chance to order.

Part 1 of 7. Watch the rest of the rest of the lecture at Bowden’s website, or click on the links that appear at the end of each video.

More Bowden lectures. 

Jonathan Bowden is a writer, artist, one of  England’s leading culture critics, and a spokesman for the New Right. We are less than enthusiastic about Bowden’s artistic explorations of irrational subjectivity, dreams, and subconcious impulses, but his understanding of the history of Western politics and culture is sophisticated.

Bowden views the present supremacy of global socialism as unsustainable, a dark period of mass propaganda and mass slavery which we must temporarily endure. We badly need cultural heroes to guide us to a value space that will foster the emergence of warriors and heroes. Evola’s rejection of mass materialism and his positive aristocratic orientation of “looking upward” provides one alternative framework to the reigning leftist cult of equality, degradation, perversion, and primitivism. We agree with Bowden and Evola that the source of our future vigor lies in the best traditions of European art and culture…”even if you don’t quite believe in them.”

A summary of the history of Social Democracy and Communism we found at The Counter-Feminist. The speaker neglected to note the support for Soviet Communism among the British Fabians, which included outright lying about the prison camps and adoption of the Potemkin village myth. Also, this presentation is a bit short on the common goals of Social Democracy and Communism — family destruction, elimination of religion, control over speech, centralized bureaucratic rule, the cultural prison camp.

There is a difference between modern socialism and Soviet Communism, the Social Democrats are perverts. But we don’t believe that there is such a thing as a Social Democrat who will draw the line at prison camps and genocides and fight to prevent them.  Even if there was one such person, he wouldn’t be a decision-maker.

Nice work being done at The Counter-Feminist. Many links of interest. Our take-away: Single men will have to form the anti-feminist movement, women and married men are unreliable. The media aren’t going to allow any anti-feminist messages, but there is a need to model the disgraced feminist. Not just the disappointed and lonely feminist, the feminist in chains, the feminist tarred and feathered and driven out of the village for perverting men and boys with Social Democrat propaganda.

Of interest:

Don’t marry. Now that socialists control law and women’s attitudes, marriage is a losing proposition for men. Family destruction and matriarchy are the goals of the Left. Step around the wasteland they have created.

Feminism in China. It’s a worldwide agenda. The socialists won’t stop until every society has been destroyed.

Eternal Bachelor

At least boycott these corporations that denigrate men.

Some intelligent analysis of young men’s dilemmas.

America is not normal. Thanks to feminism and socialism, America is the sickest culture in the world. There is a Abundance Abroad. Flee.

Men and women are wildly attracted to each other. It takes a special kind of perversion, feminism, to screw this up.

Finally, just for fun:

From Moonbattery.

Hunter Wallace reviews The Long March Toward Separation at Occidental Dissent.

This is a mature think-piece on the issues facing white separatists. The central point that caught our attention is whether white separation can be managed as a movement, will be a by-product of a greater movement splitting conservatives away from liberals, or will fall into irrelevance as American whites continue to get raped by liberals.

Many good points in this post.

“White Nationalists tend to ignore political reality. They ignore the characteristics in the White population which do not conform to their ideological presumptions.”

We have to admit that most of the white population is taken over and is of no use to us. They might not even join us when persecuted themselves.

We need to focus on the essential theme of history since the seventeenth century. The British Empire model, industrialization, formation of universities, and liberal democracy helped to bring lower-class whites out of poverty and into abundance. The rising tide of British Imperialism lifted most white boats. Now all whites are identified with British and American Imperialism. Conservatives still embrace it as “American exceptionalism” and the “war on terror.”

This historical curve of British ascent is very misleading because it appears to be white, as opposed to what it really is, the elite bloodlines taking over most of the planet and capturing its natural resources to support the development of advanced technology and monopoly global corporatism. The advanced technology curve is intended to benefit the elites. That it sometimes benefits the lower classes is merely a by-product of the advance, but this fact of material progress is overwhelmingly important to anyone who catches an updraft.

Most of the smart white people have now been pulled in to supporting technological development. Currently these innovations are being used by evil scientists and the national security police state to impose more control. To the believers in technological progress, white nationalism must seem like the most backward, primitive kind of thinking. Tribalism. The masses are following the development of biotechnology and computer technology in terms of the idealization of John Lennon’s Imagine, that the world can live as One under the technological dictatorship and destruction of all cultures. This is a lie. The myth of progress masks the true agenda of socialism, control over all culture and then destruction of all culture.

Lost in their techno-fantasies, the white techno-elites don’t fear racial takeover or any negative consequences from further technological development. They are happy in the police state. They are profiting from it. They can’t imagine that their privileges under the police state would ever be lost. Imagine trying to talk a computer scientist out of a $100,000+ job to join a disorganized and theoretical white nationalism movement just because of affirmative action, high rates of black crime, and more forced integration leading to a brownish mass population of stupid people. They think their career path is the “right vision.” They are proud of it. They really don’t have any stimulus to change their worldview when they lose their job. Even then, white preservation may not even occur to them.

Similarly, white nationalists have little to offer feminist white women who are running socialist control bureaucracies and raising their daughters in social networking and text-messaging. They are too privileged and too well paid to think in terms of race survival or the preservation of ethnic nations. They don’t have a conscience, they aren’t interested in history, and they are brainwashed into believing the world is overpopulated and everyone needs to recycle to save the planet before it runs out of “resources.”

White women are the fatal flaw in any plan to save the white race. The smarter ones are easily seduced by the special privileges granted to them during the takeover phase of socialism. They imagine that their “rights” are real and enduring, the racial minorities will always be their allies, all systems will hold together, and they can surf through life using electronic appliances powered by solar energy. They are not able to recognize that they have no real skills and a worldview based in fantasy.

Here is what will happen to them. The brutal fist of Communism is masked at first by happy-talk socialism.

No, we can’t all get along together. Somebody is going to win and somebody is going to lose.

White feminists are now goddess-worshipping Lilith demons scorning the powerlessness of white men. This is a power equation that can’t be overcome under the present state of propaganda. Watch the dumb white chicks on FOX defend women’s rights and “equality.” They are totally taken over by socialism’s planned social destruction.

We don’t believe that it is possible to spread the correct historical worldview to the masses. Even if their false views were corrected, they wouldn’t know what to do, they would be adrift without constant reinforcement from the girlfriend network propaganda stream.

Even though whites in America are restless and know that something is up, they are not sophisticated enough to identify the twin enemies, the elite white controlling bloodlines as well as the Marxist genocidal anti-white racists.

Let’s briefly identify the evil occupations that serve the takeover agenda of the elites. Genetics, computers, media, professors, bureaucrats. These are exactly the growth industries, the good jobs that most whites aspire to. How are we ever going to talk them out of these career paths? It can’t be done without a clear understanding that the history of  each branch of scientific research has been a tool selected for the elite agenda of total control.

White nationalists founder on offering a positive alternative model. They can’t run for office and get elected on a platform of destroying the major industries underpinning the police state and dismantling control bureaucracies. All programs for reform of the system rely on the system. The system is so thoroughly gamed that it is impossible to create firewalls preventing further corruption. The current Republican primary candidates are not even discussing the subject.

We agree that “forming small, white communities of trust” is the best scenario for resistance. The key question is how to get completely off of the control grid and into trust. But communities don’t form by the aggregation of individuals. Historically, the tribe was an extended family with land, weapons, and an economy. This is precisely what whites lack under the socialist takeover.

The Left wants to eliminate us, they would never agree to a peaceful separation. If they did, it would only be a temporary ruse. The Left lives by infiltration, disguise, lying, betrayal, and subversion. And, the Left produces nothing, so they are always attracted to stores of wealth to keep their parasitical game going. That’s why it is easy to predict that any store of cash will become the object of confiscation.

We cannot survive as fringe elements within the socialist control grid. Obama can flood the most remote areas with armed anti-white police forces faster than we can move. The various bureaucracies of the police state are growth industries, and they are all looking for something to do.

Mao escaped his enemies in southern China with a long march to the north. American and European whites would do well to imitate his tactic.

Of interest:

White Wyoming.

Overcoming Civility.

The Kent case.

But for some reason people keep voting for them. Now, don’t get the idea that we’re trying to suggest that the Conservatives are any better. To be better, they would have to pursue different policies, and not be corrupt. But the socialists are devoted to lying, repeatedly, cynically, as a method of governing. If you believe that socialists are governing “in the interests of the people,” you have some waking up to do.

How would you like to be a student at a German public school? The Germans are “always alone” and “terrified.” The immigrant gangsters control the school grounds. The teachers are gagged into silence. The liberal elites have abandoned the German people in favor of gangster immigrants. That is because, the liberals are gangsters.

This is your future under socialism.

You must never participate in any of the liberal institutions or you will just become a slave. It is better to seize your freedom, become a counterrevolutionary, and take your chances. Even if you have a short life, you will at least have your honor. You will be a person.

Notice the cowardice of the German teacher, smiling as he waves his order not to speak. This man is not a teacher, he is a baby-sitter and a tool of the Left control system. Why would a German teacher continue to teach in such a school unless he had been utterly degraded? They would all be better off walking away from their jobs.

If the teachers walked off their jobs, the school system could not function. This is the best thing that could happen. Abandoning all liberal institutions is a moral imperative.

Schools are disinformation and control sources for the police state.

The elites believe that you are all their cattle. They are right. They win with illegal laws and intimidation. You lose because you are the cows, the cowards. Why would you think that you have a good future as a cow in their system?

The immigrant kids know the score. They aren’t in school to learn anything. Their future is robbing you and beating you. You are their cows, too. These immigrants aren’t going to get jobs and produce anything, they are going to live off of your cowardice by bullying you.

The socialist elites said it was OK for them to exploit you. They will get a few more votes from the immigrants for betraying the whites. This criminal strategy of the Left is so naked that we wonder why anyone puts up with present conditions.

At the very least we should be in the streets fighting back.

We can’t keep writing posts for cowards. What is your plan for resistance?

Hat tip to Centurean2, the best British website.

Of interest:

Protests in Greece over school reorganization. As usual, the Left is protesting against the wrong thing.

How much influence do anti-American foreigners have on government immigration policies?

The Luz Robles case. You see, the Democrats don’t play by our rules. Why would you want to play by theirs?

Please don’t be surprised that the immigrant gangsters herd the white cows. You only exist to serve them. It won’t get better when whites are a minority.

Hat tip to TFLwarhammer.

Take a sample of the comments to this video. We know that all liberals are perverts, notice how important gay indoctrination is to them.

One of the easiest ways to operate as a pedophile is to become a “psychologist.”

You see, the sex educators are very interested in child porn.

A little home-grown resistance in Britain:

Where does this garbage come from? Communists at the United Nations.

And Communists in the EU.

Planned Parenthood brainwashes the Girl Scouts.

Did we mention that the people who want to take you over are perverts and child abusers?

Brian Gerrish emerges as citizen spokesman in Britain:

Part 2:

What did you guys talk about at your neighborhood meeting this week?

Nice history of the satanism/psychology connection at  CommonCrime. We endorse this research, it matches ours.

We are dismayed that the people who are resisting psychologist pedophiles and politician pedophiles are limiting their resistance to legal recourse. You’re not going to get very far using the socialist legal system. The pedophiles are the scientific establishment in sex education, and they are in charge of educating the whole world.